Base solution for your next web application
Starts in:
01 DAYS
01 HRS
01 MIN
01 SEC

Activities of "andmattia"

Hi @ismcagdas

ok thaks for your answer. So we can plan to move in first step to AspNetZero Core using AngularJS and in second step we can plan to move AngularJS to Angurlar

Hi,

about Q1 this but can be use to move from ZERO .Net to ZERO .NetCore obvisuly with some difference because in this way we can move in to step:

  • Step 1: .NET to .NETCore
  • Step 2: AngularJS and AngularCore Hybrid

Q1: from .NET Framework to .NET Core Q2: so at the moment the only way is move to ZERO Core. But the modularity of ABP.IO is very good option...

Answer

Hi @ismcagdas

Thanks for the clarification, so we will receive it when you will release it.

Regards

Hi @ismcagdas

all information is enough to solve my issue so I close the ticket.

thank for you support

Hi @ismcagdas

is not my problem. The issue is related to OraganizationUnit is defined on base class of AbpZeroCommonDbContext and I cann't override on second DbContext, for that reason when I use OrganizationUnit Entity on Linq the Linq engine say that already exist an object mappet to dbtable. This problem not happen for user because I can create a TUser (user1 and user2) without issue.

So if we move to virtual OraganizationUnit I can override it on derived class and prevent this.

Is it correct?

I found another issue releted to this topic AutoMapper and CustomDto

We found a solution but I'm not sure is the correct way. Add this line off code at the end of first CustomDtoMapper. We add only at the first becasue if you use it on more module Automapper give an exception that say "Mapper already initialize"

   // Add for AutoMap 8.x
    Mapper.Initialize((MapperConfigurationExpression) mapper); 

No unfortunatly no.

At the moment all Call made via AutoMapper.Map(input,Output) give the same error

Ok

So you confirm that starting from now I need to disable the module into web.confing and it's not necessay any more?

Showing 61 to 70 of 136 entries