Hi Halil,
I desperately need you help. As per my previous post [http://forum.aspnetboilerplate.com/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=580]), I am sure you realize that I am doing some sort of dashboard tool. I am pleased to announce that I can now retrieve the data successfully via SP with it still fitting into the way you are doing things within ASP.NET Zero.
A requirement has now been added that users should only see data as configured. Changing the SP is no problem as I just parameterized it.
What I would like to achieve is something very similar to how the roles are configured.
The database that I am working with via the SPs has consolidated data and unique result sets is identified via a module code, company code and a location.
This is what I have done so far: I have created a static list of modules names, very much the same as you have done with the static role names. I have created the basic application logic, presentation logic, domain logic for company, branches and locations, to dynamically add to them as needed
The idea behind branches is to allow the admin to setup a list with module and company combinations. (Similar to how the features work). This branch in turn is used as a selection within the location setup that the inherits the list of modules/company combinations, which is up for manipulation. (Similar to how the user defined permissions work). Finally multiple locations can then be added to the user, which inherits all of the modules/company combinations.
My thinking is that if things are done in this way, I would be able to access this setup in the same way I would access the other user information. Am I right in thinking that?
I have tried to look at how you do things but there are some places where I get lost. For example how does the static list of permissions get read for use within the permissionManager.
Please you expert guidance will be much appreciated. If you can please point me in the right direction and tell me what to look out for, what should be affected for this to slot into the ASP.NET Zero.
I know that this question of at least a similar question has been asked before. I would like a little more clarity regarding this.
I will have 2 dbContext, 1 connecting to the LOB database and another connecting to a DW database. I have written stored procedures that aggregates data and is returned within the result set.
I would very much like to use entity framework to handle this for me, but I do not want import the tables within that database as I won't be using them directly. My guess is that I need to create entities that will be mapped to the result set of each stored procedure. Would this not create these entities as tables in the database? (This is not what I want)
I am a bit confused as to how to handle this, because I want the dynamic WebAPI functionality to still work and for the functionality to remain very similar as how things are currently being done.
Any guidance will be much appreciated.
Could anyone provide some guidance on the best way to add a javascript library such as amCharts. Is this a manual process or do you do this through NuGet?
The steps to get this to work would seem to be: Download library, manually add script and css files to solution/Install library through NuGet Include script in ScriptPaths under App_Start/Bundling Include css in StylePaths under App_Start/Bundling Include dependency in app.js
Ideally I would like to be able to auto update these libraries when added, can you please direct me in applying best practice and how to achieve that?
How many levels of navigation is supported? It would appear that I can only dive 1 level.
The AppPermissionsProvider seems to cater for multi levels as they appear in the treemenu as defined in the code, but from the HTML point of view, it does not reflect the multi menu correctly as defined in the AppNavigationProvider.
I had a look at the Metronic demo and it does seem like you can dive 3 levels.
Is it just a case of amending the sidebar.cshtml in App\common\views\layout.cshtml?
I am going to use ASP.NET Zero framework for internal web based system and don't see much use for the landing page, would rather it go to web app upon start up.
What would be the best way to achieve this without modifying the current structure of the framework? I want to try and stick as much as possible to the way things are done in this framework, as I think it exceptional coding (hopefully I can code like that in a couple of years). Also it would make upgrading the code with new releases fairly pain free.
Is there any pitfalls with this approach?
