Activities of "tusksoft"

Thank you for the confirmation! I reached out to the Metronic support team and confirmed that the Angular demo1 scss is the same as the Html demo 1 scss

https://devs.keenthemes.com/question/generating-bundles-from-angular-application

Hi @ismcagdas

We use built outputs of Metronic and those files are just minified during AspNet Zero's build. So, we don't rebuilt Metronic from its source code in AspNet Zero.

It would be very helpful to users to explicitly state this in the documentation that it is direct output from Metronic with no modifications. As of right now, the documentation does not guide users at all on the exact steps on generating bundles from metronic's source code. Even a link/path to Metronic's readme's would be helpful.

If you want, you can download Metronic's source code, build it and then replace Metronic bundles ( style.bundle.css and plugins.bundle.css) in AspNet Zero.

This is what I am talking about in my original post. I am building from metronic source; however, there are several implementations in Metronic's source code including an angular app. If AN0 is only using the build output from the Html folder, then I will probably need to reach out to Metronic's team to find out if the Angular app's styles (likely based on Demo1) can be brought to parity with the Html main theme's styles.

I just built the source from Html and the styles are still smaller than the style bundles in AN0. What exact version of Metronic 8 was AN0 11.4.0 built with? I am using Metronic 8.0.26

Hi @tusksoft

Did you also update abp-web-resources and abp-ng2-module to latest version ?

Yes. Our Angular project is using abp-web-resources version 5.7.0 and abp-ng2-module version 8.0.0. Our AN0 version is the latest version 11.4.0. However, now that I'm looking at the change log for AN0, I see that AN0 11.4.0 only includes ABP 7.4. NPM does not list a version 7.4.0 for the abp-ng2-module package, which is why we are using version 8.0.0 instead.

Hi @tusksoft

For now, you can copy https://github.com/aspnetboilerplate/aspnetboilerplate/blob/dev/src/Abp.Web.Resources/Abp/Framework/scripts/libs/abp.signalr-client.js to your project and modify it according to your needs. We will add this option for the next release, please follow https://github.com/aspnetboilerplate/aspnetboilerplate/issues/6538

Hello @ismcagdas

We recently upgraded to ABP 8.0 and still do not see the withUrlOptions property available in the abp.signalr namespace. It appears that the abp.signalr.d.ts type definition file does not include the new property. When can we expect this to be fixed?

So is that to say that if you're using implicit/automatic UoW management you always need to use UnitOfWorkManager.Current.SetTenantId and when you're managing your on UoW you can use AbpSession.Use before the UoW begins to achieve the same effect? If that's correct, is there a reason to have two separate methods instead of just one? Is there a useful scenario for this?

Is this still the recommended path when performing an A0 framework upgrade? Delete unapplied A0 framework migrations manually and add a new migration using add-migration?

Shared via email.

So is A0 somehow removing the implicit configuration for IConfiguration? What is the reasoning behind this?

So how does it work? same entities created through a project with History disabled will not store history, but if those entities are added/modified via another project it will store. Or Entites defined in a project with History disabled will not store and History anywhere in the solution?

can you let me know the best practises around enabling/disabling EntityHistory Apparently you can toggle this on every project. Does any take precedence over the other?

Configuration.EntityHistory.IsEnabled = false;