Hi,
I don't understand why in the code bellow, the lazing loading (envelope.Sending.SenderId) use a different connection (spid) and this is used until the end of method. So the first GetAsync, begin a transaction with a spid, and the following code, who execute SaveChanges in domain service method, do it with different spid, in a different context. When an exception is raised, the roolback is done for the first context and the SaveChanges is not rolled back.
Someone can help me ? Thank you
/// <summary>
/// <see cref="ISendingAppService.ConfirmEnvelope(ConfirmEnvelopeInput)"/>.
/// </summary>
public async Task ConfirmEnvelope(ConfirmEnvelopeInput input)
{
var envelope = await _envelopeRepository.GetAsync(input.Id);
// Vérification des droits de l'utilisateur qui sollicite la confirmation.
var permissionName = AppPermissions.Operations_Payslips_Approve; // TODO: implémenter un mécanisme de détermination de l'autorisation en fonction du type d'envoi auquel le pli confirmé est associé.
if (!(await IsGrantedAsync(envelope.Sending.SenderId.Value, permissionName)))
throw new AbpAuthorizationException();
await _sendingManager.ConfirmEnvelopeAsync(envelope);
if (!input.DemoEmailAddress.IsNullOrWhiteSpace())
await _envelopeDataRepository.InsertAsync(new EnvelopeData(envelope.Id, EnvelopeDataNames.Demo.EmailAddress, input.DemoEmailAddress));
}
3 Answer(s)
-
0
Hi,
I have created an issue here <a class="postlink" href="https://github.com/aspnetboilerplate/aspnetboilerplate/issues/1833">https://github.com/aspnetboilerplate/as ... ssues/1833</a>. We will test and fix it, please follow this issue.
Thanks.
-
0
Hi,
I found the origin of my problem. I had to add :
Configuration.ReplaceService<IEfTransactionStrategy, DbContextEfTransactionStrategy>(DependencyLifeStyle.Transient);in my DataModule. In one of the domain service methods called by the application service method, SaveChangesAsync is invoqued. And, it seems that the transactions are not shared with Ef.
I do not known if the analyse and solutions are corrects. What do you think about that ?
Thank you, Jean-François
-
0
Hi @jfbaudracco,
Yes, your solution is fine. We will also try to solve this problem for the default behaviour.
Thanks.
