Good day,
I am trying to setup a tenant integration where the tenant will login via the API and retrieve and post data.
I do not see any specific method of how the Login is managed for Tenants.
The token auth does not have a field for the tenants as well.
Could you please assist with guidance on how to do an API login with a tenant? I would assume the tenant Id gets specified somewhere?
Regards, Gideon Badenhorst
Hi ANZ Team,
Just want to find out something regarding the Non-Modal pages that gets generated.
When you edit an entry it is fine how it works currently, the data gets updated when you save and the data is still available should you want to update again.
When Creating a new entry and saving afterwards, the data stays in the fields and do not clear out and also does not get linked to the just created entity. Is this how it was intended to be or should it have cleared out the data so that you can continue adding new data entries or editing the data you just added without going back and reopening?
Thanks, AuroraBMS
Hi ismcagdas,
There is no decleration for entityTypeHistoryModal.
Is there a specific decleration way/type required for this as well as where is the model located for entityTypeHistoryModal as I see there is none generated in any of the modules that I have generated so far.
Ill add the request to github for the master detail grids with a link to this topic.
Can I create the request on the same link previously previded for logging issues, is that fine or there a specific feature link?
Good day ANZ team,
First thing, thanks for the 8.7.0 non modal based update, it is quite handy and looking forward to using it a lot.
There is one thing regarding the Master-Detail which I don't quite understand and if other users can give input on their expectations regarding master detail it would be greatly appreciated as I am not sure if what I was expecting to come into play in the last few years was completely different as to the standard concept.
I am not sure if there is another reason for it being done this way but from my understanding a master-detail is normally a header with either just lines relating to it for example a sales order: Sales Order (Contains company and document info) Sales Order Lines (List of all items being ordered) And in some cases companies have multiple tabs with multiple line sets that relate to the "Sales Order Header in this case the master" as the detail.
This then becomes the Master-Detail view.
Could you please elaborate on what the goal was with the "Master-Detail" that was implemented on Power Tools and if we are missing something regarding the setup or usage of it.
At the moment the only results I am seeing from the "Create Master Detail" is the non modal pages which is not master detail at all?
Below a grid based master detail example which is the norm:
Example of a business or functional transacting environments Master Detail:
Please correct me if I am wrong in the above, there is no documentation that I could find on the new power tools feature but considering that this has been on the list for more than 2 years as a requirement people wanted, this is extremely basic and not a master detail concept at all.
I've generated linked entities: Item Master Data Batch Number Management The test was to see if Item Master will list all batch numbers relating to the item Master item selected as the lines for the item master. In short relational data to that item in a 1 to many form.
Then on the issues side: The issue I am running into is relating to Entity History:
ERROR in src/app/main/inventory/itemMasterDatas/itemMasterDatas.component.ts:93:14 - error TS2339: Property 'entityTypeHistoryModal' does not exist on type 'ItemMasterDatasComponent'.
93 this.entityTypeHistoryModal.show({
How can we go about resolving this manually in the time being?
This occurs after generation.
Thank you
Hi ANZ team,
Just some extra info:
There is a 500 error occuring on startup. GET https://localhost:44301/AbpUserConfiguration/GetAll?d=1588879485571 500 Not sure from what it would be.
Good day,
I am currently struggling a bit with timeout on the Mobile to API request. I'm probably explaining this horribly but what happens in short is that we have an integration on the API that connects to SAP Business One(ERP Package) due to the nature of this we have to check if there is a conneciton open, if it is not open we connect again. This in itself can be a lenghty process anything between 3seconds to 3-5minutes when seriously unlucky. This causes a bit of an issue as the submission of transactions can also take quite a bit of time depending on validation and amount of lines.
So when for instance during month end the company pulls reports it slow the SAP system considerably and this leads to delays in the integration.
From what I can see, the the API requests have a 30 second timeout duration, where can I change this to a longer period for the month end scenarios or high productivity times. Is there a way to allow the timeout for specific transactions like what was done with hangfire: [DisableConcurrentExecution(timeoutInSeconds: 10 * 60)]
Thank you!
Regards, Aurora-BMS
Thanks Ismcagdas,
After going through the support forum, this is literally 100 times easier than what some people went through to implement hangfire for tenants usage.
Works great!
Thanks again!
Good day ANZ team,
I have recently added in hangfire into our solution.
I noticed that hangfire only triggers on the main host company and not for the tenants or It might be that I am missing something on this side.
What I am basically trying to achieve is the following: -Process data imports into the specific tenants based on the predefined data queries triggered from a query table in that tenant. -The query execution itself is not an issue if I can access the repositories for that specific tenant in the list as I have a functional integration in place where the data comes from based on those queries.
How can I achieve data imports via hangfire per tenant of which each tenant has iets own database?
Thanks in advance!
Hi Ismcagdas & Bobingham,
Thank you for the assistance.
If I can make a suggestion regarding the documentation segment. Please add the hangfire links "guide" that Bobingham shared to the Aspnetzero documentation.
It is the most detailed bit regarding hangfire and since the placement of the files was one of the most confusing components, this one shows in details how to handle hangfire.
Thanks again!
Hi @ismcagdas,
It has been logged. Thanks for the link, will log bugs/issues there going forward.