We use angular.
I don't think it's a good solution to hide something in the view. We have a concept here that works through an API so anything that is locked should not work through the API. If I only disable it in the template it is still possible to change it through the API.
Thank you. That was the mistake. Sorry
I found the answer in this post https://support.aspnetzero.com/QA/Questions/6680
Maybe it's enough if we do it this way.
We click on Reopen :)
That is a very important request.
I know this possibility from other products. However, it is often regulated differently. Mostly there is the possibility to define addons. You then book the addons to the actual edition.
This addon can be private or public and also overlay or extend properties of the edition. Additionally an addon can be assigned several times. Each addon is assigned a price which is then added to the edition price.
For example an addon can be 10 Gb more memory. Now you can assign the tenant 2 times the addon then he has 20 Gb or even a new addon with 20 Gb.
I think that with the addons would make more sense here. You could select all the features you assign to an edition as an addon and the editions would still be nicely separated. You would also have a better overview of what you have additionally assigned to whom.
I changed the language over the UI but I reset it and it's still the same error. I also took a completely new project, didn't change anything and it's still the same bug. It's no problem for me to change the message I just wanted to let you know.
Okay, no problem. That's how I did it in the end. You should just change your documentation. There is the following text:
When we click Actions/Edit for an edition, we can see it's poperties:
https://docs.aspnetzero.com/documents/zero/latest/Development-Guide-Angular#edition-management
That's why I thought it was a bug.