Hi,
We are using the Zero framework for Single Tenancy and would like to eliminate the EF Migrator tool from our development and build pipeline.
Normally with EF Code First you should be able to use the MigrateDatabaseToLatestVersion initializer to create a new database, run migrations and then run the seed. However this does not seem to work with Zero.
We have added the following to the ZeroDbContext:
Database.SetInitializer(new MigrateDatabaseToLatestVersion<ZeroDbContext, Configuration>());
However when running the solution without an existing database the following error occurs :
"CREATE DATABASE statement not allowed within multi-statement transaction"
If we create an empty database manually first (not ideal, but acceptable) then the migrations appear to run but not the seed and we have the following error:
"There is no tenant with given id: 1"
This error is caused by the seed not executing.
Can you please advise how we can eliminate the need for the Migrator and have the migrations and seed run automatically.
Kind Regards.
Hi,
We have had a penetration test run against our ASP Zero installation and a security vulnerability has been highlighted. This medium level vulnerability relates to certain ABP Settings being visible through javascript prior to logging in to the application. The settings of concern are:
Abp.Zero.UserManagement.IsEmailConfirmationRequiredForLogin:"false"
Abp.Zero.UserManagement.TwoFactorLogin.IsEmailProviderEnabled:"true"
Abp.Zero.UserManagement.TwoFactorLogin.IsEnabled:"false"
Abp.Zero.UserManagement.TwoFactorLogin.IsRememberBrowserEnabled:"true"
Abp.Zero.UserManagement.TwoFactorLogin.IsSmsProviderEnabled:"true"
Abp.Zero.UserManagement.UserLockOut.DefaultAccountLockoutSeconds:"300"
Abp.Zero.UserManagement.UserLockOut.IsEnabled:"true"
Abp.Zero.UserManagement.UserLockOut.MaxFailedAccessAttemptsBeforeLockout:"5"
They are of concern as they relate to security and could potentially be used by a attacker to better craft their attack strategy.
Are we able to alter the settings scope (IsVisibleToClients = false) or will this break the login process? If we are unable to change this scope then how would you advise us to modify the login process so that these settings are not required on the client side prior to authentication.
Thanks,
Sean Duffy
We are running ASP.NET Zero v5.3.0, MVC 5 / JQuery which seems to come with Metronic v4.x. We would like like to upgrade to Metronic v5.1 so we downloaded the zip from the ASP.NET Zero download page. However, the contents of this zip seem to share no resemblance to the existing structure of the Metronic folder in the root of the web application. The documentation on the Metronic site also does not seem to match what is in the zip.
Additionally, this post <a class="postlink" href="https://keenthemes.com/forums/topic/problem-running-gulp/">https://keenthemes.com/forums/topic/pro ... ning-gulp/</a> suggests there is a problem with v5.1.
Thank you , however this is not a exactly duplicate issue.
The issue you have referenced does not address the questions of why the .NET Core version comes bundled with a different version of the Metronic theme than the MVC 5 vesion, when will Metronic 5 be added to the MVC 5 version and when will the stable version of Metronic v5 (without the CSS bug during install) be added to the Zero download page.
It looks as though this build is broken.
The following tests are failing when run locally and on Bitbucket Pipelines:
Should_Link_User_To_Already_Linked_User Should_Link_User_To_Default_Tenant_Admin Should_Link_User_To_Host_Admin
This is on an unmodified version of ASP.NET ZERO.
I am experiencing this issue when I publish the site to production running under IIS.
Steps taken:
Result:
{"result":null,"targetUrl":null,"success":false,"error":{"code":0,"message":"Login failed!","details":"Invalid user name or password","validationErrors":null},"unAuthorizedRequest":false,"__abp":true}
I assume that you are not supposed to run the yarn job after publish as that doesn't make sense to me.
Hi,
I am curious to know what IDE and setup people are using for ASPNETZERO running with .NET CORE and jQuery. We are running VS 2017 Enterprise with Resharper with the application hosted in IIS. My PC is in i7 with 32GB and an SSD.
The development experience is VERY slow and laggy. Also, the solution takes roughly 1 minute to build and usually fails due to VS not being able to access the application pool. I then have to restart the application pool and build again.
Now, I am not suggesting that this is the fault of ASPNETZERO, but I am curious as to what over devs are using, whether they have had speed issues with the solution and what tricks they have used to increase the responsiveness and speed of the writing and debugging code.
Thanks in advance.
Hi,
If nobody in the community is able to assist with the query, I would like to know what environment the developers are using when working with the ASP.NET ZERO repo?
Thanks in advance.
When downloading v6.3.1 from the ASPNETZERO site, Windows reports AspNetZeroRadTool.dll is affected by the Win32/Cloxer.D!cl trojan. I have re-downloaded v6.2.1 and no issues are reported.
Has anyone else had this issue?