Activities of "[email protected]"

Thanks. So it's by design. I made a few changes and everything seems to work.

Anyone?

Hi,

What is the reason for disallowing external logins to the host (no tenant)? Is it just because it didn't seem useful? Or is it because of certain technical restrictions?

I am using net core + angular.

Thanks for the fast and clear response. Fingers crossed that OIDC makes it in v5.6!

Ok after enabling google+ service in google cloud the authentication succeeds. I supose asp.net zero fills in the user metadata using the google+ service. Is this correct?

Hi,

1) I'm having trouble setting up google authentication. I'm using Core/Angular.

Angular side shows google login and sends ExternalAuthenticate request to server but exception is thrown when requesting external user info from google API:

ore.Mvc.Internal.ControllerActionInvoker - Executing action method AkzoNobel.DigitalPlant.Web.Controllers.TokenAuthController.ExternalAuthenticate (AkzoNobel.DigitalPlant.Web.Core) with arguments (AkzoNobel.DigitalPlant.Web.Models.TokenAuth.ExternalAuthenticateModel) - Validation state: Valid
ERROR 2018-07-18 12:00:13,336 [35   ] Mvc.ExceptionHandling.AbpExceptionFilter - Response status code does not indicate success: 403 (Forbidden).
System.Net.Http.HttpRequestException: Response status code does not indicate success: 403 (Forbidden).
   at System.Net.Http.HttpResponseMessage.EnsureSuccessStatusCode()
   at Abp.AspNetZeroCore.Web.Authentication.External.Google.GoogleAuthProviderApi.GetUserInfo(String accessCode)
   at AkzoNobel.DigitalPlant.Web.Controllers.TokenAuthController.GetExternalUserInfo(ExternalAuthenticateModel model) in D:\inimco\an\src\digitalplant\aspnet-core\src\AkzoNobel.DigitalPlant.Web.Core\Controllers\TokenAuthController.cs:line 371
   at AkzoNobel.DigitalPlant.Web.Controllers.TokenAuthController.ExternalAuthenticate(ExternalAuthenticateModel model) in D:\inimco\an\src\digitalplant\aspnet-core\src\AkzoNobel.DigitalPlant.Web.Core\Controllers\TokenAuthController.cs:line 253
   at lambda_method(Closure , Object )
   at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Internal.ActionMethodExecutor.AwaitableObjectResultExecutor.Execute(IActionResultTypeMapper mapper, ObjectMethodExecutor executor, Object controller, Object[] arguments)
   at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Internal.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionMethodAsync()
   at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Internal.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeNextActionFilterAsync()
   at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Internal.ControllerActionInvoker.Rethrow(ActionExecutedContext context)
   at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Internal.ControllerActionInvoker.Next(State& next, Scope& scope, Object& state, Boolean& isCompleted)
   at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Internal.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeInnerFilterAsync()
   at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Internal.ResourceInvoker.InvokeNextExceptionFilterAsync()

Is there anything else I need to do at Google Identity service to make this work? I read in another forum thread (#2607@fe1369ac-5c83-4c1f-96db-b41610790cd3) google+ api needs to be enabled? Is this so, and why?

2) I 've set up sourcelink as described in <a class="postlink" href="https://aspnetboilerplate.com/Pages/Documents/Debugging">https://aspnetboilerplate.com/Pages/Documents/Debugging</a> yet I cannot step into Abp.AspNetZeroCore.Web.dll. I can inspect the source code using ILspy though...

Why?

3) How far along is OpenId Connect social login development (for angular project)?

Hi,

I am using the RAD tool to generate entities. The naming of the generated navigation property DTO classes and angular lookup table components, is causing a bit of trouble.

Whenever you have two or more entities that contain a navigation property to one and the same entity, the RAD tool wil generate duplicate classes and components.

E.g. if you have 2 entities EntityA and EntityB that both have a navigation property to EntityC:

• the duplicate DTO classes will both be called "EntityCLookupTableDto"
• the duplicate components will be called "EntityCLookupTableModalComponent"

...I know you can configure swagger with a custom schema ID that uses full class names but I don't really like this option.

Wouldn't it be a good idea to change the RAD tool and generate DTOs and components like this?

• EntityAEntityCLookupTableDto

• EntityBEntityCLookupTableDto ...

• EntityAEntityCLookupTableModalComponent

• EntityBEntityCLookupTableModalComponent ...

In my opinion this is much cleaner than the full type name and no duplicate classes or components are possible...

Thanks in advance, Kind regards,

Jan Asselman