<a class="postlink" href="https://github.com/aspnetzero/aspnet-zero-core/issues/380">https://github.com/aspnetzero/aspnet-ze ... issues/380</a>
There is an open issue in github tracking it. They said they will begin investigation soon, and it will be included with 4.6 or 4.7, most likely.
You can find the issue here:
<a class="postlink" href="https://github.com/aspnetzero/aspnet-zero-core/issues/432">https://github.com/aspnetzero/aspnet-ze ... issues/432</a>
<cite>Mdonogma: </cite>
<cite>ismcagdas: </cite> Hi @Mdonogma,
I assume you want to create a similar page the one you have shared a link. If so, we didn't include profile.css into AspNet Zero solution. Adding it to your page might solve your problem. If it does not, you can compare included css files and add missing ones to your page.
Thanks.
Why do t you just include all the Medtronic .css files. That way developers won't have to log requests like this. My assumption is since your documentation says Medtronic them added is that all the relevance metronic .css and other artefacts are built in.
What else is missing?
Because Metronic is an incredibly bloated front end framework, and if they included everything despite not needing it, everyone would end up with an application that loaded more slowly and took up more memory than was necessary.
Part of their goal in provided Asp.Net Zero as a template is to provide a starting point for a multi-tenant SaaS application that follows best practices from the ground up.
Including unnecessary bloat is not best practice.
They do, however, provide you with the entire source of the Metronic UI, so you are free to incorporate any part of it that they have not included. You can find the link here:
<a class="postlink" href="https://github.com/aspnetzero/aspnet-zero/releases">https://github.com/aspnetzero/aspnet-zero/releases</a>
The latest version of Metronic that is incorporated in Asp.Net Zero is 4.7.5, and can be found in the download section of Asp.Net Zero Release 4.1.
It's frustrating, for sure, but SignalR was pretty clear about it.
The good news is that it looks like SignalR Core progress is moving along smoothly, so we should have Asp.Net Core 2.1 (and SignalR core) along with it by early next year.
Are you using the MVC core version with full framework?
If so, you cannot use web sockets. SignalR 2.0 is not fully compatible with Asp.Net Core. This has to do with the web sockets middleware. There are some various hacks that MIGHT get it to work for you, but they are messy.
You can find more about the issue here:
[https://github.com/aspnet/SignalR/issues/435])
Scott Brady wrote up a pretty good overview of how IdentityServer4 can be set up for a more advanced configuration here:
[https://www.scottbrady91.com/Identity-Server/Getting-Started-with-IdentityServer-4])
Do you envision this being a 4.6 release, or being included with 4.5?
<cite>ervingayle: </cite> I am using jQuery & .Net Core and hope to move to a continuous deployment model in Azure. So far there are aspnetboilerplate, jquery & .net (aspnetzero) which are being migrated into .net core jquery (aspnetzero). For Development, Staging & Production environments while you specify your configuration for each environment in the solution Azure does not provide specific isolation for an application with these SDLC environments. Essentially to mimic that model you will need to create three App Services applications.
As for continuous integration/deployment, there are some problems with deploying in my case because when the site is in use the ProjectName.Application.dll is use which causes the continuous deployment task to fail. I have even tried setting the app variable to offline (which is not ideal) because it will take the app offline during deployment to free in use files but this also fails.
You may not face this behavior using the Angular version but this has been my experience. Also to note, this is not happening with the .net aspnetzero application.
Have you tried using Team City and Octopus for your CI and automated deployment? The Azure CI in general is pretty bad. TC+Octo will give you much more control.
IdentityServer4 is an OAuth 2.0 Framework to provide authentication as a middleware service. It is designed to support authentication across multiple applications, not a single application with multiple tenants.
You can learn more about IdentityServer4 here:
[https://identityserver4.readthedocs.io/en/release/intro/terminology.html])
ABP is open source... you can find all of the ABP code in the public repository.
<a class="postlink" href="https://github.com/aspnetboilerplate/aspnetboilerplate/blob/dev/src/Abp/Modules/AbpModule.cs">https://github.com/aspnetboilerplate/as ... pModule.cs</a>
