Base solution for your next web application

Activities of "theedge"

Doh! Thanks Halil - should have thought of that.

<cite>ismcagdas: </cite> Hi,

Probably you should set website root address on host settings page. Login as host and then go to settings page. You can find it under General tab.

[https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzy5VpxF6yWxVEhCVkxtbmMxTmc/view?usp=sharing])

I am logged in as admin but there is no setting? Can I do it in the DB somewhere?

Hi,

  • Zero 1.10.1.0
  • Deployed an empty template to my staging server
  • Added a dummy user and then went to click on "Login as this user" in the user grid. However I am redirected to:

http://localhost:6240/Account/ImpersonateSignIn?tokenId=f98d89f2-0043-4581-8626-32056bbfc3fe

note localhost instead of the domain name of the deployment viz:

http://www.mydomain.com/Account/ImpersonateSignIn?tokenId=f98d89f2-0043-4581-8626-32056bbfc3fe

I cannot upgrade to the latest version at the moment. And I cannot see where this is happening in code. Any pointers?

I will come back and do some more testing. As I was in a rush for demo purposes I restored the DB on the test server from my development box.

Hi,

  • Is this stored as UTC?

Hi Halil,

I just did a web deploy and ran up the application. I assumed that the EF migrations would kick in to fill the database with whatever is needed.

I will add those records manually and see what happens, but I assume that there is other seed data that is missing?

Hi,

  • ZERO V1.10.0

I have made no changes to the downloaded template. It runs up fine locally, but when I do a web deploy to a fresh IIS website and empty database I get the following exception:

No language defined in this application.

with a call stack as as below. As the database was a brand new one, I can see that the migrations have run and that the database structure has been created. However there is no data any of the tables. I don't want to migrate any data from my development machine, so I don't believe I have to run the migration tool provided as I am using the EF migrations.

What have I missed here?

Line 50: <body class="corporate">
Line 51: 
Line 52:     @Html.Action("Header", "Layout", new { currentPageName = ViewBag.CurrentPageName })
Line 53: 
Line 54:     <div class="main">
[AbpException: No language defined in this application.]
   Abp.Localization.LanguageManager.GetCurrentLanguage() in D:\Halil\GitHub\aspnetboilerplate\src\Abp\Localization\LanguageManager.cs:29
   StartupRealm.Web.Controllers.LayoutController.Header(String currentPageName) in E:\DataSyncPoint\DJE\Natiki\Clients\StartupRealm\Development\Platform\StartupRealm.Web\Controllers\LayoutController.cs:41
   lambda_method(Closure , ControllerBase , Object[] ) +139
   System.Web.Mvc.ReflectedActionDescriptor.Execute(ControllerContext controllerContext, IDictionary`2 parameters) +229
   System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionMethod(ControllerContext controllerContext, ActionDescriptor actionDescriptor, IDictionary`2 parameters) +35
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.AsyncControllerActionInvoker.<BeginInvokeSynchronousActionMethod>b__39(IAsyncResult asyncResult, ActionInvocation innerInvokeState) +39
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.WrappedAsyncResult`2.CallEndDelegate(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +67
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.AsyncControllerActionInvoker.EndInvokeActionMethod(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +42
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.AsyncInvocationWithFilters.&lt;InvokeActionMethodFilterAsynchronouslyRecursive&gt;b__3d() +72
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.&lt;&gt;c__DisplayClass46.&lt;InvokeActionMethodFilterAsynchronouslyRecursive&gt;b__3f() +386
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.AsyncControllerActionInvoker.EndInvokeActionMethodWithFilters(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +42
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.&lt;&gt;c__DisplayClass2b.&lt;BeginInvokeAction&gt;b__1c() +38
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.&lt;&gt;c__DisplayClass21.&lt;BeginInvokeAction&gt;b__1e(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +186
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.AsyncControllerActionInvoker.EndInvokeAction(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +38
   System.Web.Mvc.Controller.&lt;BeginExecuteCore&gt;b__1d(IAsyncResult asyncResult, ExecuteCoreState innerState) +29
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.WrappedAsyncVoid`1.CallEndDelegate(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +65
   System.Web.Mvc.Controller.EndExecuteCore(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +53
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.WrappedAsyncVoid`1.CallEndDelegate(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +36
   System.Web.Mvc.Controller.EndExecute(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +38
   System.Web.Mvc.MvcHandler.&lt;BeginProcessRequest&gt;b__5(IAsyncResult asyncResult, ProcessRequestState innerState) +44
   System.Web.Mvc.Async.WrappedAsyncVoid`1.CallEndDelegate(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +65
   System.Web.Mvc.MvcHandler.EndProcessRequest(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +38
   System.Web.Mvc.<>c__DisplayClass4.<Wrap>b__3() +15
   System.Web.Mvc.ServerExecuteHttpHandlerWrapper.Wrap(Func`1 func) +27
   System.Web.HttpServerUtility.ExecuteInternal(IHttpHandler handler, TextWriter writer, Boolean preserveForm, Boolean setPreviousPage, VirtualPath path, VirtualPath filePath, String physPath, Exception error, String queryStringOverride) +1737

<cite>ismcagdas: </cite> Hi,

We actually didn't set a date for this issue.

Actually you did: #1372

and in fact it was slated for the 1.11 release of ZERO. This is NOT cool guys. :x The least you owe me is an actual delivery date of this functionality. Not something vague. Because I could wait 2 months only to have it pushed again. I see it is now in milestone 2.1 which has no due date. As a commercial customer this is not great that things can move with no actual roadmap, voted set of changes or due dates on milestones.

<cite>ismcagdas: </cite> Hi,

You are right. We planned to do it in the past but currently we are focused on mvoing to AspNet Core and Angular2 and it takes most of our time.

In that version it will be seperate from the beginning.

You have still not answered my question. :) When will it be delivered? Ultimately Core and Angular 2 are not of interest to me at this point. I need MPA and MVC.

Hi,

We might do it after this release.

Ummm. Can we get some confirmation that this is going to be the case?

For me the comprehensive split of the MPA / SPA is a big deal as I am sure it will also help clean up a heap of the code in the presentation layer. As the migration path once you are using the template is not straight forward - I don't want to have to go and clean up all the code (to remove the SPA) only to have the template restructured on your end after that. It will make things so much harder for me to integrate new features as they are released.

While I realise it is not easy (even though the code is well structured) to separate SPA / MPA this has been promised early July and we are now heading towards the end of August. :?

Showing 1 to 10 of 47 entries