Base solution for your next web application

Activities of "AidanCostcoAU"

We have been scaling out our user base, and observed a performance issue impacting Authenticate. It appears that every user logon is adding a row to the AbpUserTokens table, and as this table grows the time taken for that user to Authenticate also increases. Once there are more than a few thousand rows, the delay can move into seconds (we have seen up to 15 secs before we located the issue). If we clear the user's rows in the table to a small count, then performance comes back. The users in question are internally defined API users, although we do have some external google users.

What is the intent of this table (none of the rows I saw have anything in Value column)? Is keeping history intended?

Hi,

We just learnt that Swashbuckle v4 no longer builds unique OperationId's in the swagger Json. Previously the operationid was a concatentation of the uri, method, and http type.

The RAD tool is still generating operation names which are not unique (such as GetAll, Delete etc), so these now flow through to non-standard swagger json, which cannot be consumed by other tools.

I can override templates, but please update the base templates.

for existing/regen I should offer some options:

  1. generate globally unique method signatures (but will break existing API clients)
  2. leave the method signatures the same, but add the swashbuckle aware annotations which render the published operationid as unique - I think this might allow compatibility with existing API clients
  3. implement a swashbuckle document processor to achieve the unique operationid's

thanks

When we attempt to navigate to an external url via a side displayed menu, we get routing errors along line of: RROR Error: Uncaught (in promise): Error: Cannot match any routes. URL Segment: 'app/admin/ui-customization' Error: Cannot match any routes. URL Segment: 'app/admin/ui-customization' at n.noMatchError (main.930f82e22f6453f8bf6a.js:1) at l.selector (main.930f82e22f6453f8bf6a.js:1) at l.error (main.930f82e22f6453f8bf6a.js:1) at l._error (main.930f82e22f6453f8bf6a.js:1) at l.error (main.930f82e22f6453f8bf6a.js:1) at l._error (main.930f82e22f6453f8bf6a.js:1) at l.error (main.930f82e22f6453f8bf6a.js:1) at l._error (main.930f82e22f6453f8bf6a.js:1) at l.error (main.930f82e22f6453f8bf6a.js:1) at l._error (main.930f82e22f6453f8bf6a.js:1) at P (polyfills.fb7ef23d4a7cab2845b3.js:1) at P (polyfills.fb7ef23d4a7cab2845b3.js:1) at polyfills.fb7ef23d4a7cab2845b3.js:1 at t.invokeTask (polyfills.fb7ef23d4a7cab2845b3.js:1) at Object.onInvokeTask (main.930f82e22f6453f8bf6a.js:1) at t.invokeTask (polyfills.fb7ef23d4a7cab2845b3.js:1) at e.runTask (polyfills.fb7ef23d4a7cab2845b3.js:1) at g (polyfills.fb7ef23d4a7cab2845b3.js:1) at e.invokeTask [as invoke] (polyfills.fb7ef23d4a7cab2845b3.js:1) at m (polyfills.fb7ef23d4a7cab2845b3.js:1)

which refer to the last successful internal view displayed

If we use any of the top menu templates, the external links still behave correctly.

We have had issues with the templates not generating the same form of camelCase field names in html code as are in the services definitions, requiring hand editing of the RAD tool output. (geneerated was xBIG_ONE vs xbiG_ONE required for typescript match)

Now, we are attempting to move to 5.5.2, and the RAD tool has been updated (1.5.7). Now, there are major changes to table html code particularly, but most concerning is that all the field names which were at least camelCase before are now ALL lowercase, which is a bigger pain. Also some filter naming has changed (but not all).

Can you give us proper control of the name casing in the tool? , or otherwise get the tool to match the swagger driven service code.

thanks

Showing 11 to 14 of 14 entries