Base solution for your next web application
Starts in:
01 DAYS
01 HRS
01 MIN
01 SEC

Activities of "digitalcontrol"

We want in EntityChanges table to add few more columns so we can have additional information, like entity name or title not only entityId, and of course to implement the logic for setting values for these additional columns. Do you have any advice how this can be done?

Answer

Hi @ismcagdas Unfortuanatlly that is not solution, we already tried that option but since we need that public/private switch configurable (depend which option is active) we need it under app module. Another reason would be that we want same routes(URLs) in both situations. Can you give us some guidlines for doing this under app module? For now we are trying but hitting wall by wall

Answer

Are you still with us?

Answer

Hi, When we can expect some answer?

Answer

Is there any help regarding this situation?

Answer

Did you find anything useful?

Answer

If you can provide some more details it would be good. Here is what we've done. The question is "Is this good approach or there is something more convenient?". Frontend:

  • in auth-route-guard.ts we removed if (!this._sessionService.user) - so we don't get redirected to login page
  • in routing modules we removed data: { permission: '...' } where we wanted to open routes
  • in app-navigation.service.ts we removed permissions for the items we want to be visible to public users
  • in topbar.component.ts in setCurrentLoginInformations method we check first if appSession.user exists and then based on result we display in topbar username or login button
  • we removed all UserLinkServiceProxy service calls since we don't use them in out app
  • and commented the part of the code related to notifications for now, but that won't be a problem because we will just update endpoints to return appropriate response based on is user logged in or not Backend:
  • in ProfileAppService in GetProfilePicture method we check first if AbpSession.UserId.HasValue and then load profile picture, otherwise just return new GetProfilePictureOutput(string.Empty);
  • For now we just set attribute AbpAllowAnonymous in some app services for testing purposes, but we will add custom attribute where we will filter private/public data based on is user logged in or not

UserFriendlyException: User already in role 'User is not in role 'Administrator'. STACK TRACE: at Abp.IdentityFramework.IdentityResultExtensions.CheckErrors(IdentityResult identityResult, ILocalizationManager localizationManager) in D:\Github\aspnetboilerplate\src\Abp.ZeroCore\IdentityFramework\IdentityResultExtensions.cs:line 72 at PROJECT.PROJECTAppServiceBase.CheckErrors(IdentityResult identityResult) in C:\Work\PROJECT\PROJECT.Backend\src\PROJECT.Application\PROJECTAppServiceBase.cs:line 64 at Castle.DynamicProxy.AbstractInvocation.Proceed() at Castle.DynamicProxy.AbstractInvocation.Proceed() at Abp.Domain.Uow.UnitOfWorkInterceptor.PerformSyncUow(IInvocation invocation, UnitOfWorkOptions options) in D:\Github\aspnetboilerplate\src\Abp\Domain\Uow\UnitOfWorkInterceptor.cs:line 68 at Castle.DynamicProxy.AbstractInvocation.Proceed() at Castle.DynamicProxy.AbstractInvocation.Proceed() at Castle.DynamicProxy.AbstractInvocation.Proceed() at PROJECT.Authorization.Users.UserAppService.UpdateUserAsync(CreateOrUpdateUserInput input) in C:\Work\PROJECT\PROJECT.Backend\src\PROJECT.Application\Authorization\Users\UserAppService.cs:line 505 at Abp.Threading.InternalAsyncHelper.AwaitTaskWithPostActionAndFinally(Task actualReturnValue, Func1 postAction, Action1 finalAction) in D:\Github\aspnetboilerplate\src\Abp\Threading\InternalAsyncHelper.cs:line 35 at PROJECT.Authorization.Users.UserAppService.CreateOrUpdateUser(CreateOrUpdateUserInput input) in C:\Work\PROJECT\PROJECT.Backend\src\PROJECT.Application\Authorization\Users\UserAppService.cs:line 342 at lambda_method(Closure , Object ) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Internal.ActionMethodExecutor.AwaitableObjectResultExecutor.Execute(IActionResultTypeMapper mapper, ObjectMethodExecutor executor, Object controller, Object[] arguments) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Internal.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionMethodAsync() at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Internal.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeNextActionFilterAsync() at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Internal.ControllerActionInvoker.Rethrow(ActionExecutedContext context) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Internal.ControllerActionInvoker.Next(State& next, Scope& scope, Object& state, Boolean& isCompleted) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Internal.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeInnerFilterAsync() at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Internal.ResourceInvoker.InvokeNextExceptionFilterAsync()

We use ASP.NET Core & Angular, version 6.4.0. Framework type .NET Core 2.2. I can not reproduce this on Zero's demo. And this not happens in every case when I want to remove a role. But some role can not be removed and this exception is thrown.

This line throw error in UserManager.cs file:

Implementation of base SetRoles() method is in dll file so we can not see why this error is thrown. I was hoping that You will give us a reason for base.SetRoles() method throwing this exception.

I have user with two roles Role1 and Role2 and when I want to remove Role1 exception with message "User already in role 'User is not in role 'Role2' " is shown.

Edit: In explanation of this problem I made small mistake because role had different name and display name. The case is when I try to deletete Role1 exception message is "User already in role 'User is not in role 'Role1' ". It is same role and not have any connection to other roles.

Showing 1 to 10 of 58 entries