Hello ismcagdas, looking deeper into the code, I discovered that there is another project containing the ProxyScriptGeneratos classes. This project is Abp.Web.Common and this one is compatible with Net Core 8 because his target framework is .Net Standard 2.0
So, I implemented my AngularJsProxyGenerator, like this
public class AngularJsProxyGenerator : IProxyScriptGenerator, ITransientDependency
{
/// <summary>
/// "angularJs".
/// </summary>
public const string Name = "angularjs";
and then I added it to the ApiProxyScripting Generators :
// Add custom ApiProxyScripting for AngularJs
Configuration.Modules.AbpWebCommon().ApiProxyScripting.Generators.Add("angularjs",
typeof(AngularJsProxyGenerator)
);
and I can call it using the url -> https://localhost:44301/AbpServiceProxies/GetAll?type=angularjs&v=638629666671806923
Finally it works as expected.
Hope this helps
Br, Fabrizio
Hi @ismcagdas, I found a solution by myself
I created a dedicated interface for my custom application services and another interface for the app services provided by asp net zero template.
Then, in the MyAppWebCoreModule.cs
I wrote:
Configuration.Modules.AbpAspNetCore()
.CreateControllersForAppServices(
typeof(MyAppApplicationModule).GetAssembly(), useConventionalHttpVerbs: true
).Where(type => typeof(IAspNetZeroBaseAppService).IsAssignableFrom(type));
Configuration.Modules.AbpAspNetCore()
.CreateControllersForAppServices(
typeof(MyAppApplicationModule).GetAssembly(), useConventionalHttpVerbs: false
).Where(type => typeof(IMyAppBaseAppService).IsAssignableFrom(type));
By this way I can force the HttpPost on all my custom services (as the very old version of AspNetZero) and at the same time I can maintain the conventional verbs for the Angular part included in the new Asp Net Zero template
I hope this helps
Br, Fabrizio
Hi m.aliozkaya, I'm going a little deep in analysis and, changing the parameter to useConventionalHttpVerbs = false, a lot of methods (starting from the boostrap phase) doesn't work on the angular application. Not only "some things may not work as expected"
You can check this document for more information. https://aspnetboilerplate.com/Pages/Documents/AspNet-Core#application-services-as-controllers
I red many time the documentation and I also searched in the forum before asking but no side-effects it's mentioned changing this parameter.
Since AspNetZero is a paid product and support is part of the services, I would have expected a more precise, technical and detailed answer
Hi, thanks for suggestions, I've updated all the data using a simple code snippet .
Br, Fabrizio
After a deep investigation , I found the reason.
I have added on backend side this sserialization formatting rule
// Improve -> set by default enum to string conversion in serialization
services.AddControllers().AddJsonOptions(x =>
{
// serialize enums as strings in api responses (e.g. Role)
x.JsonSerializerOptions.Converters.Add(new JsonStringEnumConverter());
// ignore omitted parameters on models to enable optional params (e.g. User update)
//x.JsonSerializerOptions.DefaultIgnoreCondition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull;
});
So all the enum previously returned as numbers have become strings.
So, in the "change tenant" function code -> tenant-change-modal.component.ts
.subscribe((result: IsTenantAvailableOutput) => {
switch (result.state) {
case TenantAvailabilityState.Available:
abp.multiTenancy.setTenantIdCookie(result.tenantId);
this.close();
location.reload();
return;
case TenantAvailabilityState.InActive:
this.message.warn(this.l('TenantIsNotActive', this.tenancyName));
this.focusTenancyNameInput();
break;
case TenantAvailabilityState.NotFound: //NotFound
this.message.warn(this.l('ThereIsNoTenantDefinedWithName{0}', this.tenancyName));
this.focusTenancyNameInput();
break;
}
This switch doesn't match any value and the button simply do nothing :-(
I'm sorry, it's my fault but I was unlucky to don't get an error.
Consider adding a default condition in this switch case in order to manage all unexpected values.
Have a nice day
Br, Fabrizio
Hi oguzhanagir, I tried both solutions but still not work.
The server side middleware has no effect.
The HTML Meta tag on the angular side incresed the number of errors
My considerations are:
Could be something related to my VS Code? yarn version -> v1.22.10 node version -> v20.15.1 npm version -> v10.7.0
Is the api IsTenantAvailable response valid and complete?
Thanks for support.
Br, Fabrizio
Hi all, thanks for suggestions. I'm trying different solutions and I confirm that's not easy.
Obviously, if I will find a good approach (not a workaround), I will share my implementation with the community.
Br
To be honest I don't like so much the idea to use a real db, because is very convenient to use an in memory db. I think asp net zero is a very powerful framework but this is a big limitation in a moment in which geospatial data are used a lot. In all my projects I need to do geospatial query. So I hope you consider with high priority to change effort with an equivalent library that support DbGeography. I tried to change effort by myself but for me is very hard because I have not a deep knowledge of asp net zero.
So, let's try to summarize what are the possibilities at the state of the art of asp net zero, keeping in mind that I need DbGeography:
_hostDb = DbConnectionFactory.CreateTransient();
and everything work?
You say asp net zero 4.0 won't use Effort. What library it will use for in memory testing?
Thanks for your support Fabrizio Dominici
Hi, no, I commented each DbGeography type except TestPosition. Unfortunately I cannot share my project with you for company policy. Please can you share with me the project you tested that ignore the DbGeography type? (<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>) I have version 3.3.0 of aspnetzero core angular with .NET Framework 4.6.1. By the way, I tried to download a new aspnetzero core angular project 3.3.0 to create a basic test project with only an entity with a DbGeography problem but now it seems full asp.net core. Is it right? And it seems there is not DbGeography in entity framework (core version). I have had a lot of problems trying to migrate from asp.net framework to asp.net core and also from visual studio 2015 to visual studio 2017.
Anyway, can you change Effort with another library? Because I need to test also geospatial queries. Can you change Effort with another library? This is the best thing for me and for each person that buy aspnetzero I think.
Thanks a lot Fabrizio Dominici
Hi. I have the same problem and I tried for a long time to bypass it without success. I know that it is an issue of Effort but now I really need help.
I would like to explore 2 different possibilities:
protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
base.OnModelCreating(modelBuilder);
modelBuilder.Entity<Report>().Ignore(_ => _.TestPosition);
}
_hostDb = DbConnectionFactory.CreateTransient();
Moreover, Moq seems a little bit different than Effort. I will appreciate suggestions and code snippet to configure Moq or another in-memory db library
Can you help me?
Thanks Fabrizio Dominici