I think I figured it out.
Make a custom Repository in the EfCore project like this
public class MyEntityRepository :MyAppRepositoryBase<MyEntity>, IRepository<MyEntity>
{
public MyEntityRepository(IDbContextProvider<MyAppDbContext> dbContextProvider) : base(dbContextProvider) { }
public override IQueryable<MyEntity> GetAll()
{
return base.GetAll().Include(x => x.MyRelatedEntity);
}
}
Then in the PreInitialize method of EntityFrameworkCoreModule
Configuration.ReplaceService<IRepository<MyEntity>, MyEntityRepository>();
Since lazy loading is not yet added to EF Core, how do I eager load related entities for all get methods?
For example:
public class MyEntity : Entity
{
public int MyRelatedEntityId { get; set; }
public MyRelatedEntity Related { get; set; }
}
How do I make sure that all methods on IRepository<MyEntity> eager load and include MyRelatedEntity? This includes GetAll, GetById, Find etc
Thank you. I was able to figure out what these were via SQL schema compare but it is good to have it confirmed.
I also was able to figure out that if you follow the process below, you can create migrations to handle this upgrade
migrationBuilder.Sql("UPDATE AbpUsers SET NormalizedUserName = UPPER(UserName)");
migrationBuilder.Sql("UPDATE AbpUsers SET NormalizedEmailAddress = UPPER(EmailAddress)");
migrationBuilder.Sql("UPDATE AbpRoles SET NormalizedName = UPPER(Name)");
Hi,
What are you suggestions for upgrading from v3.4.0 to v4.0.0?
I seem to have been able to update all of my source code just fine. The issue I have is with the database.
Since you've swapped from EF6 to EFCore, this has caused a major problem as there is a missing migration.
It appears that between 3.4.0 and 4.0.0 of AspNetZero that there were a lot of database changes. Since the EntityFrameworkCore project assumes there is no existing database and only includes an Initial migration I have no real way to upgrade my database which is on v3.4.0.
The changes seem to include the removal of some tables, column additions to some entities such as user, changes to indexes and more.
Do you have any suggestions for how to accomplish upgrading the database?
Thanks.
Hi,
Just wondering if it is safe to disable Entity Framework Lazy Loading?
public MyDbContext() : base("Default")
{
this.Configuration.LazyLoadingEnabled = false;
}
I want to disable it in my DbContext but want to make sure it isn't going to cause any issues with ABP.
Thanks, Sean
Hi,
It is related.
It is to do with the way you are registering the routes and the order that they are registered in.
The problem is that by adding a catch all route inside of the RouteConfig.cs of the web project. It gets registered BEFORE the dynamic API routes.
Here is how I resolved the issue.
Step 1: Add a catch all route in the PostInitialize method. This will ensure that it is registered AFTER all others.
public override void PostInitialize()
{
var server = HttpContext.Current.Server;
var appFolders = IocManager.Resolve<AppFolders>();
appFolders.SampleProfileImagesFolder = server.MapPath("~/Common/Images/SampleProfilePics");
appFolders.TempFileDownloadFolder = server.MapPath("~/Temp/Downloads");
appFolders.WebLogsFolder = server.MapPath("~/App_Data/Logs");
try { DirectoryHelper.CreateIfNotExists(appFolders.TempFileDownloadFolder); } catch { }
// Register catch all here
RouteTable.Routes.MapRoute(
"CatchAll",
"{*urlString}",
new { controller = "CatchAll", action = "Index" }
);
}
Step 2: Update RouteConfig.cs with the following. We need to comment out the default route, map attribute routes and add explicit routes for scripts and views controllers
public static class RouteConfig
{
public static void RegisterRoutes(RouteCollection routes)
{
routes.IgnoreRoute("{resource}.axd/{*pathInfo}");
// Map attribute routes
routes.MapMvcAttributeRoutes();
//ASP.NET Web API Route Config
routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "DefaultApi",
routeTemplate: "api/{controller}/{id}",
defaults: new { id = RouteParameter.Optional }
);
routes.MapRoute(
"Home",
"",
new { controller = "Page", action = "Home" }
);
// Add explicit routes for some ABP controllers that were being handled by the now commented out default route
routes.MapRoute(
"AbpScripts",
"AbpScripts/{action}",
defaults: new { controller = "AbpScripts" },
namespaces: new [] { "Abp.Web.Mvc.Controllers" }
);
routes.MapRoute(
"AbpAppView",
"AbpAppView/{action}",
defaults: new { controller = "AbpAppView" },
namespaces: new[] { "Abp.Web.Mvc.Controllers" }
);
// Comment out old default route in order to define explicit attribute routes
//routes.MapRoute(
// name: "Default",
// url: "{controller}/{action}/{id}",
// defaults: new { controller = "Home", action = "Index", id = UrlParameter.Optional },
// namespaces: new[] { "ProductsOnline.Web.Controllers" }
//);
}
}
Step 3: Go through all Controllers and define explicit attribute routes as follows
[AbpMvcAuthorize]
// Add explicit attribute routing
[Route("profile/{action}/{id?}")]
public class ProfileController : ProductsOnlineControllerBase
{
<cite>exlnt: </cite> That file is already there. I updated the bundle reference to use "Darkblue" so that resolved the color issue. The menu still does not work. It will not expand when you click on it. Can you help me with that?
To fix this issue you need to edit YourApplication.Web>App>common>views>layout>sidebar.cshtml
You need to change this
<a href="javascript:;" class="auto" ng-if="childMenuItem.items.length">
To this
<a href="javascript:;" class="auto nav-link nav-toggle" ng-if="menuItem.items.length">
Hi,
If I define a route like the following underneath all routes in in the RouteConfig.cs, calls from the angular app to the dynamic API no longer work. Instead, they are passed to my CatchAllController as shown in the image.
routes.MapRoute(
"CatchAll",
"{*urlString}",
new { controller = "CatchAllController", action = "Index" }
);
This is a fairly major issue for us at the moment so any help on how to resolve the problem would be appreciated.
Perhaps it has to do with moving the order of precedence for dynamic api routes above my catch all route? The catch all route should be the very last option if no other routes were found.
Regards, Sean
Hi,
In Abp.Configuration.Setting.Value the string length is set to 2000.
I need the field to be NVARCHAR(MAX)
How would you suggest to accomplish this in an ABPZero template?
Regards, Sean
Hi,
I'm trying to write some code to create a new tenant from a console application.
When I do this, I receive the error "There is no permission with name: Pages.Tenants"
I have both data and core modules added as dependencies to my console application module. Are you able to replicate this problem?
Any help appreciated.
Cheers, Sean
